In a digital landscape, where anonymity and personal statements often intertwine, serious allegations have emerged from an anonymous online user concerning an individual named Tamra Dicus, also known by the nickname “Caliisme”. According to the anonymous source’s claims, Dicus, based in Washington DC, has purportedly engaged in actions that have raised significant moral and legal concerns.
At the age of 47, with physical attributes described as a height of 5’4”, weighing 140 lbs, and having brown eyes and black hair, Dicus, who identifies as a male and prefers relationships with women, has been accused of dishonest behaviors specifically linked to sexually transmitted infections. The anonymous accuser adamantly alleges that Dicus has deliberately spread herpes, by failing to disclose his health status prior to interactions that could expose others to the virus.
Further intensifying these accusations, the source characterizes Dicus as a person with deceptive tendencies, often exhibiting manipulative and deceitful behavior —labeling them as a “predator” in the context of spreading sexually transmitted diseases. Words such as “lying”, “manipulating”, and “gaslighting” are utilized to describe his alleged methods of interaction, suggesting a pattern of deceit by omission particularly about his health status.
While these are stern allegations, it’s important to approach them with a sense of skepticism as they are presented by an anonymous source without corroborating evidence provided within the communication. The charges, if true, point towards serious ethical and potentially legal violations. However, in the absence of verified facts or an official investigation, the veracity of these claims remains unconfirmed. Such situations underline the complexities and responsibilities tied to sharing and receiving information in the online sphere, where the impacts can be significant and far-reaching.
Learn More: Source Data
